Home  |  Fees and Times  |  First Aid  |  Articles  |  Books  |  Useful Links  |  Contact

  YourVeryGoodHealth.co.uk

Why Vitamin C is So Good – June 2002

© Matthias Rath 2002 ( www4.dr-rath-foundation.org )

Smothering the vitamin revolution: 1991 - 2002

The story of one of the greatest corporate scandals in modern history – the attempt by the largest pharmaceutical companies to (i) prevent public discussion of, and access to, information by Drs Rath and Pauling that high-dose vitamin therapy was by far the most appropriate treatment for a wide range of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and lung disease (ii) infiltrate the European Commission so successfully that an EU Directive was passed in March 2002 effectively wiping vitamins from the shelves.

1991 The story begins

Solution to the Puzzle of Human Cardiovascular Disease: Its Primary Cause is Ascorbate defiency, leading to the deposition of lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen / fibrin in the vascular wall

Matthias Rath and Linus Pauling

„My dear Kepler, what do you say of the leading philosophers here to whom I have offered a thousand times of my own accord to show my studies, but who, with the lazy obstinacy of a serpent who has eaten his fill, have never consented to look at the planets, or moon, or telescope? Verily, just as serpents close their eyes, so do men close their eyes to the light of truth. ”

Galileo Galilei in a letter
to Johannes Kepler ca. 1630

Human cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the result of the accumulation of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), rather than of low density lipoprotein (LDL), in the vascular wall. It is generally not the consequence of plasma LDL levels, but rather of the level of Lp(a), which is formed in the liver in amounts largely determined by the rate of synthesis of apo(a). This rate is increased by low ascorbate concentrations. Human CVD is primarily a degenerative disease caused by ascorbate deficiency. This deficiency is the result of the inability of humans to synthesize endogenous ascorbate combined with an insufficient dietary ascorbate intake. The deficiency is aggravated by genetic defects such as the LDL receptor defect and by exogenous risk factors for CVD leading to additional ascorbate depletion. Ascorbate deficiency results in morphologic changes of the vascular wall. In order to avoid the fatal consequences of extreme ascorbate depletion, such as hemorrhagic bleeding in scurvy, ascorbate deficiency simultaneously increases the plasma concentration of vasoconstrictive and hemostatic risk factors, including Lp(a) and fibrinogen. Chronic ascorbate deficiency leads to the extracellular accumulation of Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin, the hallmarks of the atherosclerotic lesion. The underlying impairment of the vessel wall is unmasked mainly at sites of altered hemodynamic conditions, leading to myocardial infarction and stroke as the predominant manifestations of human CVD. Thus for patients with coronary or cerebrovascular disease the instability of the vessel wall due to ascorbate deficiency is the leading risk factor, rather than plasma constituents. In contrast, risk factors in plasma trigger the manifestation of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). In this condition plasma constituent such as oxygen free radicals from cigarette smoke or oxidatively modified triglyceride-rich lipoproteins exert a noxious effect on the vascular wall in the periphery and PVD develops. Ascorbate depletion of the vascular tissue is also a precondition for the manifestation of PVD. Human CVD is multifactorial. Ascorbate deficiency, however, is the common denominator of this disease. The comprehensive pathogenetic and therapeutic concept presented in this paper represents the solution to the puzzle of human cardiovascular disease and should lead to the improvement of human health

Introduction

We recently formulated the concept that lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is a surrogate for ascorbate, vitamin C. (1) This concept revealed the physiological role of Lp(a) as well as new therapeutic approaches. On the basis of earlier work and additional experimental and clinical evidence we now present a detailed theory of human CVD. The primary cause of human CVD is a deficiency in ascorbate leading to the deposition of Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin in the vascular wall. We elucidate the interaction of ascorbate and Lp(a) and present a pathomechanism that differs from existing concepts (2,3,4) in that it is able to explain the unique features of human atherosclerosis. We also present prophylactic and therapeutic considerations that open new pathways to prevention and treatment of CVD.

The Pivotal Role of Lp(a) in Human Cardiovascular Disease

Lp(a) was discovered by Kare Berg in 1963. (5) It is closely similar to LDL, the main difference being that a glycoprotein, apo(a), is attached by a disulfide bond to the apoprotein of LDL, apo B, giving a larger surface area to the lipoprotein sphere. The c-DNA sequence of apo(a) shows a striking homology to that of plasminogen (6), with multiple repeats of kringle 4, one kringle 5 and a protesase domain. Because of the homology of apo(a) with plasminogen Lp(a) has been called the missing link between atherogenesis and thrombogenesis (7).

Evidence that Lp(a), not LDL, is the primary lipoprotein responsible for initiating the development of atherosclerosis was reported by one of us and his colleagues at Hamburg University (8,9,10). In the most comprehensive studies assessing the role of Lp(a) in human vascular wall yet reported it was found that Lp(a), not LDL accumulates selectively in the vascular wall of CVD patients. Moreover the extracellular accumulation of Lp(a) was closely correlated to the development of atherosclerotic plaques.

Most importantly, in several hundreds of histological cross sections from the human coronary arteries and the aorta immunostaining for apoB, without congruent staining for apo(a) was a rare event, indicating that the vascular wall deposition of LDL alone occurs rarely (9). The deposition of Lp(a) in the vascular wall as determined by immuno-morphometric analysis because extraction methods overestimate the role of LDL: a major fraction of Lp(a) is found dissociated in the vascular wall into apo(a) and the LSDL-like particle particularly under post-mortem conditions. (8) Earlier investigators have evidently failed to differentiate between LDL and Lp(a) so that the initiation of atherosclerotic lesions was incorrectly attributed to LDL.

This conclusion was recently confirmed by a study determining plasma risk factors in patients with inherited LDL-receptor defects. In these familial hypercholesterolemic patients the incidence of CVD was significantly determined by the Lp(a) plasma concentration, with total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in plasma not related to the clinical manifestation of CVD.

There is now strong clinical and experimental evidence that Lp(a) is a more important risk factor than total cholesterol or LDL-cholesterol for coronary heart disease (12), stroke (13), as well as restenosis of vein grafts after coronary bypass surgery (14). We therefore conclude that Lp(a) is the lipoprotein primarily responsible for the initiation of human CVD. The role of LDL is best characterized as an aggravating risk factor for CVD in patients with simultaneously elevated Lp(a) plasma levels.

The Ascorbate-Lp(a) Connection

We observed that Lp(a) has mainly been detected in the plasma of man, other primates and a few other species that have lost the ability to synthesize ascorbate and consequently have low ascorbate levels compared to animals with endogenous ascorbate production. We do not exclude, however, that small amounts of Lp(a) will also be found in other species. The loss of ascorbate synthesis is the result of a genetic mutation in the gene for L-gulono-c -lactone oxidase; this mutation occurred 40 million years ago in an ancestor of the primates. Subsequently, Lp(a) became a major plasma constituent in primates and man. We therefore proposed that Lp(a) is a surrogate for ascorbate. Vice versa, ascorbate is a surrogate for Lp(a), since in most species Lp(a) is replaced by ascorbate without any disadvantage.

Previously, it has been assumed that Lp(a) is primarily a pathogenic particle and that Lp(a) plasma concentrations are primarily determined by genetic factors. Our publication of the Lp(a)-ascorbate connection marked a turning point in research directions and suggested numerous investigations. Subsequently, it was shown that ascorbate, the strongest reducing agent normally present in the body, and also synthetic reducing agents such as N-acetylcysteine (15), decrease Lp(a) plasma levels. In a clinical trial in CVD patients an increased intake of ascorbate lowered the plasma Lp(a) level (unpublished observations).

Moreover, we proposed that Lp(a) strengthens the vascular wall, particularly in ascorbate deficiency. At low ascorbate concentrations the synthesis of collagen and elastin is impaired and the deposition of Lp(a) helps to control the resulting instability of the vessel wall and to contain disease progression. Apo(a), a macromolecule, would compensate for this impairment and its demonstrated binding to glycosaminoglycans and other compounds of the extracellular matrix would be beneficial. Moreover, apo(a) has been shown top bind with high affinity to proline and hydroxyproline and is likely to bind to collagen and elastin, macromolecules that are enriched in these amino acid residues. Increased intake of ascorbate eliminates the need for Lp(a) to strengthen the blood vessels and thus ascorbate can replace Lp(a).

We have recently been able to confirm that ascorbate can replace Lp(a) at the site of the disease process. In this pilot study we used the hypoascorbemic guinea pig , an animal like man, unable to synthesize ascorbate but able to synthesize apo(a). When fed dietary ascorbate in small amounts, corresponding approximately to the usual human intake, these animals rapidly develop atherosclerotic plaques and deposit Lp(a) in the vascular wall. Larger intakes of ascorbate inhibited the deposition of Lp(a) in the arterial wall and prevented the development of atherosclerosis. (16)

Ascorbate and the Regulation of Plasma Lp(a)

Lp(a) plasma levels among individuals vary by as much as 1000 fold. This considerable variation is to a large extent the result of genetic factors determining the synthesis of apo(a), but also those of apoB and lipids. It may be that the modifying genes controlling apo(a) synthesis at the optimum level have not yet become fully effective, so that in some individuals this synthesis has overshot the mark, predisposing them to CVD.

Beside genetic factors, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are also regulated by dietary factors, one of them being niacin, which has been shown to lower plasma Lp(a) levels (17). Another dietary factor is ascorbate. We have obtained preliminary results that ascorbate decreases apo(a) synthesis in human hepatoma cells in vitro. Ascorbate may also decrease the assembly of the Lp(a) particle by reducing the disulfide formation between apo(a) and apo B in the liver.

Ascorbate Defiency, the Risk Profile for CVD and Lp(a)

Ascorbate depletion is the common metabolic denominator of endogenous and exogenous risk factors for CVD. Many genetic defects are associated with ascorbate deficiency. As a result of a genetic defect the rate-constants of certain enzyme-controlled metabolic reactions are decreased. These rate constants can be increased towards normal values by increasing the concentrations of certain cofactors (18). In the attempt to normalize these decreased rate constants, ascorbate and other essential cofactors for metabolic reactions are depleted. Ascorbate, a potent reducing and hydroxylating molecule, is destroyed in these reactions. Accordingly, in the effort to control the damage done by the genetic defect the level of ascorbate is decreased, exacerbating the general deleterious effects of ascorbate deficiency.

One of the genetic defects where the ascorbate depleting steps are well characterized is the LDL receptor defect. All the expressions of LDL receptors (19) the inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase in the synthesis of cholesterol (20), the protection of LDL against oxidative modification (21) and the stimulation of 7a -hydroxylase in the catabolism of cholesterol to bile acids (22). We suggest that it is ascorbate deficiency that is the real cause of the premature CVD associated with this inherited disease, exacerbated by the genetic defect.

In this context the recent study in familial hypercholesterolemic patients by Seed et al. (11) is of interest. In this study elevated LDL or the underlying genetic defect of the LDL-receptor were not correlated with CVD. Thus this genetic defect leading to ascorbate deficiency in combination with the genetic deposition for high Lp(a) levels significantly increased the risk of premature CVD.

As do genetic defects, exogenous risk factors for CVD lead to ascorbate depletion. The observed correlation between a high fat diet or cigarette smoking and CVD can also be explained as the result of induced ascorbate deficiency, caused by destruction of ascorbate in the catabolism of lipids and the effort to detoxify the substances in the smoke. With insufficient dietary ascorbate resupplementation, both endogenous and exogenous risk factors for CVD aggravate ascorbate deficiency and accelerate CVD development.

Ascorbate Deficiency and the Vascular Wall

Ascorbemia, the total depletion of ascorbate in scurvy, leads to a complete loss of the integrity and stability of the vascular wall and to the extravasation of blood into the perivascular area. Hypoascorbemia, leads to early forms of this impairment.

The vascular endothelium is directly affected by ascorbate deficiency. Characteristic features are changes in the cellular morphology and the presence of large intercellular gaps. These changes lead to the loss of the function of the endothelium as a barrier between the blood and the vascular wall, to increased permeability, and consequently to increased infiltration of plasma constituents into the vascular wall.

The extracellular matrix of the wall is affected. Collagen and elastin, the principal macromolecules of this matrix, are made from their precursors, procollagen, and proelastin, by hydroxylation of prolyl and lysyl residues. Ascorbate deficiency leads to an incomplete hydroxylation and thus weakens the extracellular matrix. Alterations of the endothelium and loose connective tissue are known to be characteristic features of atherosclerotic plaques.

To limit the fatal consequences of prolonged ascorbate deficiency metabolic counter measures were developed under strong evolutionary pressure.

Ascorbate Deficiency and Metabolic Countermeasurs

To limit the consequences of prolonged ascorbate deficiency metabolic countermeasures were developed under strong evolutionary pressure. The most detrimental effect of ascorbate depletion is blood loss. Thus ascorbate deficiency, to prevent the extravasation of blood, triggers a whole series of metabolic reactions, with the primary aim of inducing vasoconstriction and hemostasis.

It is therefore not surprising that ascorbate deficiency induces virtually all the risk factors predisposing to atherogenesis and thrombogenesis, most of them with immediate clinical significance. In the first line of defense against the danger of perivascular bleeding increased levels of thromboxane and decreased levels of prostacyclin (23) and prostaglandin E lead to vasoconstriction and hemostasis. We have shown that prolonged ascorbate deficiency increases fibrinogen and Lp(a) plasma levels and in this situation the antifibrinolyitic properties of Lp(a) become beneficial.

We are aware that there is no one-to-one relation between ascorbate and Lp(a). Lp(a) is a rather late part in a sequence of acute-phase reactants, or risk factors induced by ascorbate deficiency. Because of its lipid deposition in the vascular wall, however, Lp(a) is particularly detrimental.

The therapeutic implications are evident: ascorbate supplementation increases the levels of prostacyclin and potentially EDRF, the endothelial derived relaxing factor. This potent vasodilative factor is identical with nitric oxide and ascorbate may preserve the active form of EDRF by inhibiting oxidation to nitrogen dioxide. Simultaneously, ascorbate decreases the levels of thromboxane, fibrinogen, and Lp(a) and thereby contributes to a fundamental improvement of the risk profile in clinical cardiology.

The Roles of Lp(a) and Fibrinogen in the Vascular Wall

In the Hamburg studies Lp(a) was found mainly deposited together with fibrinogen/fibrin (10). Moreover, Lp(a) has been shown to bind to immobilized fibrinogen/fibrin (25) and evidence for a direct binding of Lp(a) to fibrinogen/fibrin in the vascular wall was reported (9). All these observations can now be explained. In ascorbate deficiency the need for increased plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and fibrinogen, for binding of Lp(a) to fibrinogen/ fibrin in the vascular wall, and for its selective retention become evident.

The hemostatic properties of Lp(a) and fibrinogen are needed to counteract the deleterious consequences of ascorbate deficiency. Lp(a) also has functions in the containment of diseases and the repair of tissues. Free-radical-induced and plasmin-induced tissue degradation are established pathways.

We have suggested that apo(a), because of many disulfide groups that can be reduced by ascorbate to thiols, can itself function as an antioxidant (1). Moreover, we now suggest that because of its homology to plasmin Lp(a) also inhibits plasmin-induced tissue degradation. The lipid content of the Lp(a) particle simultaneously provides the substrate for cell repair. In order to exert its physiological functions Lp(a) is deposited as an intact lipoprotein particle and can be isolated from the vascular wall (8). The extracellular accumulation of Lp(a) in the vascular wall is an independent pathomechanism of human CVD which is at variance with concepts suggesting the cellular uptake and degradation of lipoproteins by scavenger cells is a prerequisite for atherogenesis (2,4).

A Theory for Human Cardiovascular Disease

We are now able to present a novel pathomechanism for human cardiovascular disease. This disease is primarily a degenerative disease caused by chronic ascorbate deficiency. The extracellular deposition of Lp(a) and fibrinogen is a defense mechanism to limit the damage done by this deficiency. Under chronic conditions this defense may, however, turn into a pathologic process leading to the continued accumulation of Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin in the vascular wall. Thus Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin become the hallmarks of the atherosclerotic lesion (see figure).

The impairment of the integrity of the vascular wall in ascorbate deficiency leads to increased infiltration of plasma constituents and to intimal thickening throughout the vascular system but not necessarily to the development of atherosclerotic plaques. If, however, altered hemodynamic conditions reveal the underlying impairment of the vascular wall these plaques develop.

This theory explains why human atherosclerosis develops mainly at sites of altered hemodynamic conditions such as the branching regions of coronary, cervical and cerebral arteries. It explains why the primary manifestations of human CVD is myocardial infarction and stroke, and also the increased risk of CVD associated with hypertension, where an increased systemic pressure extensively unmasks the underlying impairment of the vascular wall.

It is unlikely that Lp(a) primarily exerts its atherogenicity by binding to the plasminogen receptor on endothelial cells (27). These receptors are present throughout the vascular system so that such a pathomechanism would lead to increased incidence of peripheral vascular diseases and venous thrombi, which are not necessarily associated with elevated Lp(a) plasma levels

Peripheral Forms of Atherosclerosis

We are now able to account for another phenomenon associated with human CVD: The principle difference in the pathomechanisms leading on the one hand to atherosclerosis at predisposition sites and on the other hand to peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Myocardial infarction and stroke are by far the most frequent manifestations of CVD. The localized development of atherosclerotic plaques in these patients can only be explained if the instability of the vascular wall is the main risk factor. Elevated concentrations of plasma risk factors, e.g., cholesterol or LDL, can not explain the phenomenon of localized manifestation of CVD. They may, however, play an aggravating role in the development of CVD in the individual.

In the development of PVD, however, these plasma risk factors play a much more prominent role, exerting a direct or indirect noxious effect on the vascular wall. Consequently, this leads to atherosclerosis in the vascular periphery where the contact between noxious plasma constituents and the endothelium is prolonged. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, because of their enhanced susceptibility to peroxidation, are such potential challengers, leading to vascular damage in the periphery.

This theory explains the peripheral form of CVD associated with Type-III hyperlipidemia, a metabolic disorder in which triglyceride-rich lipoproteins accumulate in the plasma as very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL). These conditions are also characterized by a further pathomechanism of lipid deposition in the vascular wall. In addition to the extracellular deposition of Lp(a) described above, the cellular uptake of oxidatively modified lipoproteins by scavenger cells plays a more prominent role. This can also explain why foam cells are found much more frequently in the vascular wall of patients with these metabolic disorders.

A similar pathomechanism is involved in PVD associated with cigarette smoking, Oxygen free radicals from the cigarette smoke damage the endothelium directly or via oxidative modification of lipoproteins. It is noteworthy that ascorbate, the strongest antioxidant normally present in the human body, is also a potent inhibitor of these pathomechanisms.

In general, inherited metabolic disorders resulting in an elevated concentration of potentially noxious plasma constituents are frequently associated with PVD, e.g., in homocystinuria.

Of particular interest is the pathogenesis of PVD in diabetes mellitus. The glucose and ascorbate molecules share structural similarities and compete for the same transport system for cellular uptake. Elevated glucose levels competitively inhibit an optimum tissue uptake of ascorbate, leading also to a chronic ascorbate depletion of the vascular wall and its impairment. Therefore, dietary supplementation of ascorbate should lead to an effective control of diabetic angiopathy.

The different pathomechanisms leading on the one hand to CVD at predisposition sites and on the other hand to PVD are frequently interrelated. Nevertheless, their discrimination described here may prove helpful for future therapeutic approaches. Independent of the different pathomechanisms involved, ascorbate deficiency is a common denominator of human CVD.

Prophylactic and Therapeutic Considerations

The theory presented in this paper immediately suggests effective prophylactic and therapeutic treatments for most individuals at risk CVD and for CVD patients.

Prophylaxis.

Ascorbate, a potent reducing and hydroxylating agent has been shown to be effective in achieving critical prophylactic aims: lowering the plasma Lp(a) level, preventing Lp(a) deposition in the vascular wall (16), decreasing elevated LDL levels (28), increasing HDL levels (29), preventing oxidative modification of lipoproteins, protecting against oxidative damage by scavenging oxygen free radicals and by regenerating tocopherol, [ppteventing the oxidative modification of lipoproteins (30), and, above all, preserving the integrity of the vascular wall and preventing the formation of atherosclerotic plaques (16).

Moreover ascorbate hits all these therapeutic targets at the same time. It will be hard for any pharmaceutical product to surpass ascorbate, a substance that has been developed and improved by nature over billions of years. Premature atherosclerosis is essentially unknown in most animals, whereas millions of humans, with chronic ascorbate deficiency, die of atherosclerosis and related diseases each year.

Therapeusis.

Ascorbate is able not only to prevent the formation of atherosclerotic lesion but also to reduce existing plaques. It is well-established that ascorbate increases HDL plasma levels, thereby promoting reverse cholesterol transport by uptake of intra- and extracellular lipid from the vascular wall.

On the basis of our finding that plaque development is paralleled by the extracellular deposition of Lp(a) it is evident that a major focus of therapeutic development is the release of Lp(a) or its lipid component from the arterial wall. Ascorbate may be involved in two ways: by dissociating apo(a) from the LDL-like component of Lp(a), thus enhancing the lipoprotein efflux from the vascular wall and by converting lysyl residues in this wall into hydroxylysyl residues, thereby decreasing the binding affinity to components of the vascular wall by way of the lysyl haptenic group.

The efficiency of releasing Lp(a) from its bonds to fibrinogen/fibrin in the vascular wall may be considerably enhanced by administration also of small prophylactic doses of one or more inhibitors that compete with the lysyl haptenic groups [lysine, 6-aminohexanoic acid, p-aminomethylbenzoic acid, trans-4-aminomethylcyclohexane carboxylic acid, and others].

For patients with advanced cardiovascular disease therapeutic amounts of these inhibitors, together with ascorbate and as adjuncts to appropriate conventional therapy, might be prescribed, once their therapeutic effect has been clinically proved.

It might be argued that this class of substances, which are generally used as anti-fibrinolytic agents, might induce coagulative complications. These substances are, however, protease inhibitors and inhibit activation of fibrinolysis as well as the activation of coagulation (31). These substances have been used in long-term studies for different indications without compromising side effects. We have, however, not found any earlier recommendation of the use of these substances in the pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular disease. The combination of these substances with ascorbate may be considered ideal since ascorbate reduces the need for further Lp(a) deposition in the vascular wall and the inhibitors would enhance the release of already deposited Lp(a). Moreover, ascorbate is known to have anti-coagulative (32) and profibrinolytic properties.

Conclusion

The concept presented here offers for the first time a conclusive explanation for the unique features of human CVD. It can answer the questions that have remained yet unexplained by presently available hypotheses on the development of CVD (1,2,3) Ascorbate deficiency is a precondition as well as a common denominator of CVD. With rare exceptions CVD is a degenerative disease. Its leading risk factor is the instability of the vascular wall rather than any plasma constituents, and its primary pathomechanism is the deposition of Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin in the vascular wall.

We can now explain why the strongest downward trend in CVD mortality of all industrialized countries occurred in the USA, the country with the highest vitamin C consumption. Moreover, we now understand why these two developments exactly parallel each other. On the basis of the scientific concept presented in this publication it is now possible to achieve a similar success also in other countries.

The pathomechanisms described here and the therapeutic conclusions presented are the solution to the puzzle of human cardiovascular disease.

We have discussed the following points in detail:

•  the cause of today ' s most important disease by ascorbate deficiency, the result of a genetic defect in combination with inadequate intake of supplementary ascorbate;

•  the regulation of plasma Lp(a) levels by ascorbate and the reasons why Lp(a) and ascorbate are found alternatively in most animal species;

•  the identification of ascorbate deficiency as a common denominator of endogenous and exogenous risk factors for CVD;

•  the conditions under which a physiological defense mechanism designed by nature to limit the deleterious effects of ascorbate deficiency can turn into a pathological process;

•  the extracellular deposition of Lp(a) and fibrinogen/fibrin as the primary mechanism of human atherogenesis;

•  the details of a comprehensive theory of human cardiovascular disease; and the difference between atherosclerosis at predisposition sites and peripheral vascular disease;

•  finally, we presented prophylactic and therapeutic recommendations made on the basis of these discoveries, which may lead to a breakthrough for the prevention and treatment of human CVD.

50 years ago ascorbate deficiency was established as a prominent risk factor in CVD (33), and 37 years ago ascorbate was shown in preliminary angiographic studies to reduce atherosclerotic plaques in man (34). There is no rational explanation why these early observations of the therapeutic value of ascorbate were ignored and did not become common knowledge in the medical profession long ago.

Our publications have initiated further clinical trials. The evidence of the beneficial effects of ascorbate available now is already convincing but comprehensive clinical confirmation should soon end the decades of reluctance and skepticism. We are convinced that before long ascorbate will become the treatment of first choice for cardiovascular disease.

The therapeutic significance of our discovery is not limited to CVD; Lp(a) and ascorbate are involved in cancer, inflammatory disease, and other diseases, including the process of aging. The deposition of Lp(a) in the vicinity of disease can be conceived as a defense mechanism to contain the progression of disease, particularly at low ascorbate concentrations. The Lp(a)-ascorbate connection is a regulatory principle of nature that directly affects human health. Abolition of ascorbate deficiency may profoundly improve human health and increase life expectancy of human beings.

References

1. Rath M & Pauling L (1990): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 87, 6204-6207.
2. Brown MS & Goldstein JL (1984): Scientific American 251, 58-66.
3. Ross R (1986): New England Journal of Medicine 314, 488-500.
4. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, & Witztum JL (1989):
New England Journal of Medicine 320, 915-924.
5. Berg K (1963): Acta Pathologica 59, 369-382.
6. McLean JW, Tomlinson JE, Kuang WJ, Eaton DL, Chen EY, Fless GM, Scanu AM & Lawn RM (1987):
Nature 300, 132-137.
7. Brown MS & Goldstein JL (1987): Nature (London) 330, 113-114.
8. Rath M, Niendorf A, Reblin T, Dietel M, Krebber HJ & Beisiegel U (1989): Arteriosclerosis 9, 579-592.
9. Niendorf A, Rath M, Wolf K, Peters S, Arps H, Beisiegel U & Dietel M (1990):
Virchows Archiv. A. Pathol. Anat. 417, 105-111.
10. Beisiegel U, Niendorf A, Wolf K, Reblin T & Rath M (1990): European Heart Journal 11, Suppl. E., 174-183.
11. Seed BM, Hoppichler F, Reaveley D, McCarhty S, Thompson GR, Boerwinkle E & Utermann G (1990):
New England Journal of Medicine 322, 1494-1499.
12. Dahlen GH, Guyton JR, Attar M, Farmer JA, Kautz JA & Gotto AM Jr. (1986): Circulation 74, 758-765.
13. Zenker G, Koltringer P, Bone G, Kiederkorn K, Pfeiffer K & Jurgens G (1986): Stroke 17, 942-945.
14. Hoff HF & Gaubatz JW (1982): Atherosclerosis 42: 273-297.
15. Gavish D & Breslow JL (1991): Lancet 337, 203-204.
16. Rath M & Pauling L (1990): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 87, 9388-9390.
17. Carlson LA, Hamsten A & Asplund A (1989): Journal of Internal Medicine 226, 271-276.
18. Pauling L (1968): Science 160, 265-271.
19. Aulinskas TH, Van der Westerhuyzen DR & Coetzee GA (1983): Atherosclerosis 47, 159-171.
20. Harwood HJ Jr, Greene YJ & Stacpoole PW (1986): Journal of Biological Chemistry 261, 7127-7135.
21, Frei B, England L & Ames BN (1989): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86, 6377-6381.
22, Ginter E (1973): Science 179, 702-704.
23, Beetens J, Coene M-C, Verheyen A, Zonnekyn L & Herman AG (1986): Prostaglandins 32, 335-352.
24, Loscalzo J, Weinfeld M, Fless GM & Scanu AM (1990): Arteriosclerosis 10, 240-245.
25. Harpel PC, Gordon BR & Parker TS (1989): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86, 3847-3851.
26. Smith EB & Cochran S (1990): Atherosclerosis 84, 173-181.
27. Miles LA, Fless GM, Levin EG, Scanu AM & Plow EF (1989): Nature 339, 301-303.
28. Ginter E (1979): Wld. Rev. Nutr. Diet. 33, 104-141.
29. Bates CJ, Mandal AR, Cole TJ (1977): Lancet 3, 611.
30. Jialal I, Vega GL & Grundy SM (1990): Atherosclerosis 82, 185-191.
31. Aoki N, Naito K & Yoshida N (1978): Blood 1, 1-12.
32. Bordia A & Verma SD (1985): Clinical Cardiology 8, 552-554.
33. Paterson JC (1941): Canadian Medical Association Journal 44, 114-120.
34. Willis GC, Light AW & Gow WQS (1954): Canadian Medical Association Journal 71, 562-568

1994 after the drug cartels suffered a reverse in the US Congress

•  Furthermore, in the face of skyrocketing health care costs, every responsible politician should recognise that on purely financial grounds it is also in the interest of every national economy to actively support the breakthrough in vitamin research and cellular medicine

1995 The drug companies fight back

They come back with an attempt through the UN(!) to set up a ban on all UN member states issuing information to the public about vitamins.

1997 Rath and Pauling fight back again with a world health conference in Germany

The Chemnitz Programme

This declaration was made by Dr. Matthias Rath on 21 st June 1997 after a lecture in Chemnitz Municipal Hall, to thunderous applause from the audience of 3,700. This programme was his first open declaration of war against the contempt for humanity revealed by the pharmaceutical industry ' s plans in the framework of the Codex Alimentarius Commission.

1. We, the people of this Earth, are aware that at the end of the 20 th Century we still have completely inadequate knowledge of our bodies and of the causes of good health and disease. Physical incapacity is today forcing millions of people into disastrous physical and financial dependency on interest groups which profit from the continued existence of disease, principal among them being the pharmaceutical industry.

2. The corporate purpose of the pharmaceutical industry is the trade in disease, not the prevention or eradication of disease. The pharmaceutical industry has a direct financial interest in the continued existence of disease as the prerequisite for the continuing growth of pharmaceutical markets.

3. The pharmaceutical industry ' s most lucrative business comes from those diseases that are most widespread. The pharmaceutical industry itself is the main obstacle to medical breakthrough in the control of cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, cardiac insufficiency, cancer, osteoporosis and other endemic public health scourges.

4. The trade in disease is one of the most profitable trades there is. The profits made by the pharmaceutical industry are several times greater than the average for other industries. These pharmaceutical industry profits are the main reason for skyrocketing health-care costs. The economies of virtually all industrialised countries in the world are in the stranglehold of the pharmaceutical industry.

5. We, the people of this Earth, are doubly damaged by this state of affairs. Firstly, we have to meet the skyrocketing health-care costs either directly or indirectly. Secondly, we receive no return on our money in the form either of good health or the control of endemic public health problems.

6. In the face of express resistance from the pharmaceutical industry, a medical breakthrough has now been achieved which will lead to cardiovascular diseases being brought under control. Heart attack and stroke are not true diseases, they are the consequences of chronic vitamin deficiency - and as such are preventable.

7. Now that humanity has the unique opportunity to free itself from the scourge of heart disease, pharmaceutical companies are forming a worldwide cartel designed to prevent this happening. To achieve their aims the pharmaceutical companies are willing to accept the continuing existence of cardiovascular disease and the premature deaths of millions of people.

8. These activities have laid bare the pharmaceutical industry ' s true agenda for all the world to see. We, the people of this Earth, are no longer prepared to subject ourselves to the yoke of this immoral interest group.

9. We declare that the pharmaceutical industry, whose business is founded on the maintenance of disease, is unethical and incompatible with the fundamental principles of human rights. We demand immediate legal steps to ban this industry from conducting its business.

10. The intentional maintenance of disease in order to promote sales of drugs and the prevention of the eradication of disease have as a consequence the death of millions of people. In view of the scale of this crime they must be punished with the most severe penalty available under prevailing law, and further laws must be passed by the nations of the world without delay. At international level these misdeeds must immediately be pursued as criminal violations of human rights.

11. Existing pharmaceutical companies must be subjected to immediate investigation into the extent to which they have enriched themselves from the deliberate maintenance of disease and prevention of its eradication. If the pharmaceutical companies are found guilty of this crime, their assets must be seized in payment of damages to affected parties and the community generally.

12. Politicians and other accomplices who are guilty of aiding and abetting crimes of this sort must be called to account before the courts of law.

13. Laws preventing free access to and use of vitamins and other natural therapies must be repealed.

14. Above all, this programme lays the foundations for a new system of health care. As a first step, the preservation and improvement of health will be declared an inalienable human right.

15. The primary goal of the new health care system will be the prevention and eradication of disease. Vitamin research and Cellular Medicine constitute a sound scientific basis for the implementation of effective, side-effect free and economical health care measures.

16. We, the people of this Earth, declare that we will build up this new system of health care and that we ourselves will form the cornerstones of this new system.

17. The foundation of this new system of health care is the provision of comprehensive public information and education on health care issues. In every town and city, information and advice centres will be set up through which committed lay persons and members of the healing professions can contribute to the creation of this new system.

18. The training of existing health professionals will be extended and new health professions will be created with the goal of guaranteeing basic grass-roots health care.

19. Health-care education will be made a compulsory subject in schools and the further education of the public on health-care issues will be promoted at all levels.

20. Medical research and licensing of drugs will be subjected to a comprehensive system of public control.

From this gathering we call on the people of Germany, Europe and the entire world to support this programme and to implement it in your town and your country. Do it for your own health and for that of generations to come. From now on, only vote for politicians who support this programme and assist in its implementation. Do not trust any politician who is a puppet of the pharmaceutical industry.

1999 How played it in UK – parliament went against controlling vitamins

Why the British government had to withdraw its anti-vitamin legislation MLX 249 in the middle of summer recess

London. The news bomb detonated in the third week of August: In the middle of the summer vacation, the British government had to withdraw one of the most outrageous legislations in recent history: MLX 249. Under the pressure of the international Pharma-Cartel and the British pharmaceutical multinationals Smith, Kline & Beecham, and Glaxo Welcome, the British government was about to forbid forever the dissemination of natural health information in relation to vitamins and other natural therapies.

What forced the Government to withdraw this unconscionable legislation, was our previous health news “Good Health – Do it Yourself!” that had been distributed during the first weeks of August to hundreds of thousands of households in London and other British cities. In this four-page health newsletter we unmasked the unethical background of the MLX 249 legislation and encouraged the people in Great Britain to alert their political representatives.

The breakthrough

The newsletter was written by Dr. Matthias Rath, the physician and scientist, who had discovered that heart attacks and strokes are no diseases rather than the consequence of vitamin deficiency and that they are preventable. Dr. Rath also holds the world ' s first patents for the natural reversal of heart disease. Ever since Dr. Rath published his discoveries early in this decade, the pharmaceutical industry had conspired to stop the dissemination of this live saving natural health information.

“ Business with disease ”

In his newsletter Dr. Rath revealed that the basis of the pharmaceutical industry is the ”business with disease.” This industry is fighting prevention, therapy and eradication of diseases, because it would destroy a multi-billion dollar global market of unnecessary pharmaceutical drugs. MLX 249, the UK law that would have criminalised the further dissemination of this information was a law dictated by the international Pharma-Cartel against the health interests of millions of people in Great Britain and other countries.

Never before in British history was a law of that significance and with such powerful backers withdrawn in such a short time. Never before did the British government take steps of that significance in the middle of summer recess, forced by public demand in the middle of the holiday season. Never before was there a piece of printed matter that so directly must have touched off the nerves of hundreds of thousands of people in London and beyond. Never before were the members of Parliament in the UK confronted with such burning questions: Whom do you represent, the health interests of millions of people or the financial interests of a handful of pharmaceutical shareholders.

A political firestorm

The reactions we got tell us the magnitude of this fire storm. We got letters from patients, health food stores, writers and many others, all of them unanimously out of gratitude for opening the eyes of the people for the unethical plans of MLX 249. Even a member of the House of Lords wrote on the to Dr. Rath informing him about his contact to health minister Dobson. Apparently, he was not alone and Mr. Dobson ' s summer vacation was cut short by the public demand to withdraw MLX 249 immediately.

In April this year, Dr. Rath had met with representatives of the British health food industry. When he realised that even these representatives were unaware of the global dimension of this pending legislation and that resistance among the health food stores was developing slowly, he decided to prepare for this information campaign in order to help the people in Great Britain and ultimately save millions of British lives.

2000 More research shows Vitamin C has major effect on cancer

Now an all natural scientifically proven approach to cancer has become available!

Fact #1:
Up until now there has been no scientifically proven natural health approach that effectively prevents cancer cells from spreading.

Fact #2:
Chemotherapy, radiation and other conventional treatments of cancer do not distinguish between cancer cells and healthy cells and attack them both.

Fact #3:
The deadly phase of cancer starts with the invasion of other organs by cancer cells (metastasis). There exists no conventional treatment that effectively controls metastasizing cancer.

Fact #4:
Cancer cells spread through the body by producing massive amounts of enzymes that digest the surrounding tissue.

Fact #5:
Our research has shown that a combination of vitamin C with the natural amino acids lysine, proline and specific extracts from green tea can block the invasion of cancer cells.

Fact #6:
This all natural approach to cancer is an effective and safe way to control the spreading of cancer cells - without any side effects.

2002 Recent research on Vit C and Lungs

Vitamin C Keeps Lungs Healthy, Researchers Say

An orange a day may help keep lung disease away, new research from the UK suggests. In the study, researchers confirmed that people who consume high levels of vitamin C and magnesium tend to have healthier lungs. And for the first time, the research showed that people with high levels of vitamin C intake experience less decline in lung function over time.

(May 29, 2002 / Reuters Health) -- In the study, researchers confirmed that people who consume high levels of vitamin C and magnesium tend to have healthier lungs. And for the first time, the research showed that people with high levels of vitamin C intake experience less decline in lung function over time.

By minimizing the decline in lung function as time passes, a diet containing lots of foods rich in vitamin C may lower the odds of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the study ' s authors report in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Mounting evidence suggests that vitamin C and other antioxidant vitamins and minerals may be involved in asthma and COPD, a group of illnesses that includes bronchitis and emphysema. Exactly how antioxidants keep lungs healthy is uncertain, though they are known to neutralize DNA-ravaging compounds called free radicals that contribute to aging and disease.

Previously, Tricia M. McKeever and colleagues at the University of Nottingham found in a study of more than 2,600 adults that high levels of vitamin C and magnesium both corresponded with healthier lungs based on a measure of lung function called forced expiratory volume 1, or FEV1. Nine years later, when the researchers were able to follow up with a little more than half of the original study participants, they confirmed these findings.

“ High vitamin C and magnesium intake are associated with higher levels of lung function, ” McKeever told Reuters Health. “ Over a period of 9 years, those with higher levels of intake of vitamin C experienced less severe decline in lung function than those with lower levels of intake, ” she added.

“ A diet rich in food supplying these nutrients appears to be beneficial to lung health, ” McKeever said. She recommended getting enough vitamin C and other potentially lung-boosting nutrients by eating a healthy diet containing the recommended servings of fruit and vegetables. US guidelines recommend 2 to 4 servings of fruit and 3 to 5 servings of vegetables each day.

The study did not show any effect of magnesium, vitamin E or vitamin A on the decline of lung function over time.

An important area of future research, the authors point out, will be to see how soon in life the benefits of vitamin C and other nutrients begin, as well as to see whether dietary changes can improve lung health once lung function has already started to decline.

[SOURCE: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine]

2002 A major setback in Europe

13 March 2002 - the day that the people of Europe brought their Parliament to a standstill

To date 604 million votes from around the world have been cast demanding free access to natural remedies for the people of Europe. On Wednesday morning, the avalanche of protests had grown to such an extent that it crippled the e-mail system of the European Parliament. Parliament demanded that the President of the EU considered measures to enable delegates to communicate again.

On this historic day, the people of Europe expressed their wish to develop a new health care system, a health care system founded on natural and effective remedies free of side-effects.

It was practically a farce that this was the day the European Parliament made a decision on a ‘ Directive on dietary supplements ' which will ban effective vitamin therapies and other natural remedies throughout Europe. About two-thirds of the delegates bowed to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and passed this law. One third of the delegates stood up for the health interests of the people and voted against. A transitionary period of three years was agreed for products already on the market.

The 13 th March 2002 will go down in history as the date on which the European Parliament revealed itself as ‘ Strasbourg puppets ' and supported a massive market in useless pharmaceutical preparations against the growing competition from research into natural remedies.

The bizarre effects of the Europe-wide law can be seen from the example of the natural amino acid lysine. The human body cannot produce lysine, therefore we depend on obtaining an optimal supply from our food and dietary supplements. And now it has also become clear that this essential substance may also be the key to fighting the endemic disease cancer (more information at www.stopping-cancer-naturally.org ). This medical breakthrough and the consequent threat to the pharmaceutical market was of course the reason for the pharmaceutical cartel running amok.

The laughable vote against free access to life-preserving natural remedies is not a surprise if you know that the pharmaceutical industry writes its own laws across Europe. For example, a member of the supervisory board of the second-largest pharmaceutical group in the world (Merck, Sharp & Dohme), Frits Bolkenstein, sits in the ‘ Cabinet ' of the European Parliament, the European Commission. There they make laws in the interests of the pharmaceutical groups, barring access to side-effect free medicines for 380 million Europeans and opening the way to the ‘ pharmaceutical trade in disease ' .

February 2002: Official Committees on Drug Policy usually contain drug company representatives

February 05 , 2002 [ Reuters ]

Most Doctors Who Set Guidelines
Have Industry Ties

By Jacqueline Stenson

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The vast majority of doctors involved in establishing national guidelines on disease treatment have financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry that could potentially sway their recommendations and inappropriately influence thousands of other physicians, a new study concludes.

Eighty-seven percent of guideline authors had some type of relationship with drug companies, yet these often were not disclosed, according to survey responses from 100 authors of guidelines published from 1991 to 1999 for common diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure and asthma.

More specifically, 38% of respondents said they had served as employees or consultants for pharmaceutical companies and 58% had received financial support for medical research. In addition, 59% had links with drug companies whose medications were considered in the particular guidelines they authored, according to the report in the February 6th issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association.

"The findings show that people who work on committees who write practice guidelines have lots of financial relationships with companies whose products they're assessing," study author Dr. Allan Detsky, physician-in-chief at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, told Reuters Health.

And these figures may underestimate the problem, the researchers said, because only 52% of the authors contacted for the survey responded. Some may have declined to participate because they did not want to disclose their industry relationships, the report indicates. Though the investigators did not name names, the survey did not explicitly guarantee anonymity.

While industry ties don't necessarily mean that a doctor can't provide an objective opinion, "it's a potential problem," Detsky said.

In the study, the researchers did not actually search for concrete examples in which industry ties translated into improper treatment recommendations. But when respondents were asked whether relationships with drug companies influenced guideline recommendations, 19% said they thought their co-authors' recommendations were swayed by their relationships and 7% said they thought their own relationships influenced recommendations.

Detsky pointed out that industry relationships are often an essential part of doing business for doctors. Many of the nation's top medical researchers at prestigious academic institutions--the same ones sought for guideline authorship--have industry relationships because it is the pharmaceutical companies who finance most of the nation's drug research. Detsky himself has received honoraria for speeches, consulting fees and research grant money from drug companies.

So how much industry involvement should disqualify a doctor from participation in clinical guidelines? "That's the $64,000 question," Detsky said. "Any cut point would be considered arbitrary with the possible exception of zero involvement."

The researchers specifically recommended the disqualification of authors who own equity in a company whose products are being reviewed in the guidelines.

Beyond that, each medical group that sets guidelines should devise their own ways for identifying and dealing with potential conflicts of interest within their specialty--"ways we can preclude these conflicts from harming the consumer," Detsky said.

In the survey, 55% of respondents said the guidelines they worked on had no formal process for declaring relationships with drug companies. And just 2 of the 44 guidelines evaluated in the study listed the authors' industry relationships in print.

SOURCE:
The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002;287:612-617.



REFERENDUM FOR NATURAL THERAPIES!
Say no to a worldwide ban on vitamin therapies!

To the heads of state and governments of the nations of the Earth!
To decision-makers at the UNO and the UN-suborganisations! 
To the members of the Codex Alimentarius Commission!
To members of the European Parliament!
To members of parliaments all over the world!
To all political decision-makers worldwide!
To the representatives of my interests and all political decision makers.

It is with great concern that I have learnt that, under pressure from the pharmaceutical industry, vitamin therapies and other natural treatments are to be banned for millions of people in Europe and throughout the world. To protect the interests of the billion-pound industry in purely symptom-oriented and often dangerous pharmaceutical drugs, my right of access to effective vitamin therapies and natural treatments and also my fundamental right to health and well-being are being seriously violated.

The European Commission's "Directive on Dietary Supplements" and the UN's "Codex Alimentarius" plans solely serve the pharmaceutical industry's interest in artificially sustaining its billion-pound markets in now superfluous pharmaceutical drugs. Obviously the pharmaceutical industry lobby does not shy away from the abuse of the highest political bodies in the world in pursuit of its unscrupulous aims. These attacks on the human right to health come at a time when ever more widespread diseases and public health problems can be successfully combated by vitamin therapies and other natural treatments free of side-effects. 

I myself am interested in natural health. I am aware that vitamin deficiency is the main cause of the most widespread health problems of our time. I also know that heart attack, stroke, cancer, osteoporosis, diabetes and other public health problems could be reduced to a tiny fraction of their current frequency. The saving of millions of human lives is dependent upon one single factor: how quickly can the live-saving information about the health benefits of vitamins and other natural therapies be spread. This makes all legislative efforts to censor and ban the spreading of natural health information knowledge all the more unethical and contemptible.

According to the statistics of the UNO, two billion people suffer worldwide from vitamin deficiency - both in industrialized and in developing countries. In light of these figures it is irresponsible for this same global organization to allow itself to be abused by the pharmaceutical industry lobby in its aim of blocking the dissemination of this vital information. The spurious argument that these censorship laws are to protect consumers from the alleged side-effects of vitamins is a lie. Worldwide, several hundred thousand people die every year from the harmful side-effects of pharmaceutical drugs - but not a single person has ever come to any harm as a result of vitamin therapies. 

Worse still, the deadly side-effects of cholesterol-blockers and other pharmaceutical drugs have become the fourth-most common cause of death in the industrialized world - surpassed only by heart attack, cancer and stroke. The planned laws banning vitamin therapies and other side-effect free natural health treatments are not improving my health, but only of the billion-dollar "business with disease". If you, as a political decision-taker, support these laws, you are knowingly risking the unnecessary deaths of millions of people.

I am appalled to find out that these censorship plans are to be unscrupulously forced through on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry whilst the war against terror is making all the headlines, without any public discussion and against the express will of the people! I condemn the fact that neither the EU Commission nor the so-called "Codex Alimentarius" Commission is an elected body or is subject to any form of democratic control. It is significant that this same EU Commission was recently dismissed by the European Parliament for corruption and for taking bribes from multinational companies. 
I realize that I have to take responsibility for my own health. My health and the lives of millions of my fellow human beings are more important than the share prices of a handful of pharmaceutical industry speculators and their political lackeys.

By signing this I am taking part in the largest referendum of all time and call on you, as a political decision-maker, to:

  • Stop the Codex Alimentarius and the EU Directive on dietary supplements, as well as all related censorship laws on national and international level!
  • Commit yourself to giving all people in the world free and unrestricted access to life-saving information about the health benefits of vitamin therapies and other natural treatments. 
  • Commit yourself to the fight to make natural health a fundamental right enshrined in your country's constitution and also as a basic human right within the UN Charter.
  • I demand the immediate launch of a referendum for the fundamental right to natural health! 

I will no longer cast my vote for any politician who does not commit himself or herself to free access to natural treatments! I am counting on you! I look forward with great interest to your reply and statement. 
 



me

: ...............................................................................

Address

: ...............................................................................

Signature

: ...............................................................................

Worse still, the deadly side-effects of cholesterol-blockers and other pharmaceutical drugs have become the fourth-most common cause of death in the industrialized world - surpassed only by heart attack, cancer and stroke. The planned laws banning vitamin therapies and other side-effect free natural health treatments are not improving my health, but only of the billion-dollar "business with disease". If you, as a political decision-taker, support these laws, you are knowingly risking the unnecessary deaths of millions of people.

I am appalled to find out that these censorship plans are to be unscrupulously forced through on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry whilst the war against terror is making all the headlines, without any public discussion and against the express will of the people! I condemn the fact that neither the EU Commission nor the so-called "Codex Alimentarius" Commission is an elected body or is subject to any form of democratic control. It is significant that this same EU Commission was recently dismissed by the European Parliament for corruption and for taking bribes from multinational companies. 
I realize that I have to take responsibility for my own health. My health and the lives of millions of my fellow human beings are more important than the share prices of a handful of pharmaceutical industry speculators and their political lackeys.

By signing this I am taking part in the largest referendum of all time and call on you, as a political decision-maker, to:

  • Stop the Codex Alimentarius and the EU Directive on dietary supplements, as well as all related censorship laws on national and international level!
  • Commit yourself to giving all people in the world free and unrestricted access to life-saving information about the health benefits of vitamin therapies and other natural treatments. 
  • Commit yourself to the fight to make natural health a fundamental right enshrined in your country's constitution and also as a basic human right within the UN Charter.
  • I demand the immediate launch of a referendum for the fundamental right to natural health! 

I will no longer cast my vote for any politician who does not commit himself or herself to free access to natural treatments! I am counting on you! I look forward with great interest to your reply and statement. 
 





Southfields Homeopathic Practice
Charles Lowe MLCHom MARH
020 8874 2399